महाराष्ट्र की 288 विधानसभा सीटों का रिजल्ट आज: 11 में से 6 एग्जिट पोल में भाजपा गठबंधन को बहुमत, 4 में कांग्रेस गठबंधन; 1 में हंग एसेंबली

admin November 23, 2024 321
maharastra

मुंबई/ महाराष्ट्र में किसकी सरकार बनेगी? क्या भाजपा, शिवसेना शिंदे, अजित पवार गुट वाला गठबंधन फिर से सरकार में वापसी करेगा? या फिर कांग्रेस, शिवसेना उद्धव और NCP शरद पवार गुट की जीत होगी। महाराष्ट्र का अगला मुख्यमंत्री कौन होगा? एकनाथ शिंदे, देवेंद्र फडणवीस, उद्धव ठाकरे, शरद पवार या नाना पटोले। क्या निर्दलीय और छोटे दल किंगमेकर बनकर उभरेंगे। आपके हर सवाल का जवाब आज दोपहर 12 बजे तक मिल जाएगा।

महाराष्ट्र विधानसभा की 288 सीटों पर 20 नवंबर को वोटिंग हुई थी। 2019 के मुकाबले इस बार 4% ज्यादा वोटिंग हुई। 2019 में 61.4% वोट पड़े थे। इस बार 65.11% वोटिंग हुई।

वोटिंग खत्म होने के तीसरे दिन एग्जिट पोल आए। 11 पोल में से 6 में भाजपा गठबंधन यानी महायुति की सरकार बनने का अनुमान जताया गया। 4 पोल में कांग्रेस गठबंधन यानी महाविकास अघाड़ी (MVA) और एक पोल में हंग एसेंबली की संभावना है।

About The Author

admin

भुवन वर्मा – प्रबंध संपादक
अस्मिता और स्वाभिमान
मोबाइल नंबर – 9826704304

See author's posts

More Stories

deputy-cm-samrat-choudhary

लोकभवन पहुंचे सम्राट चौधरी, सरकार गठन का दावा; नए सीएम का शपथ समारोह कल

admin April 14, 2026 0
assembly-elections-

Assembly Election 2026; असम-केरल-पुडुचेरी में शांतिपूर्ण मतदान संपन्न, EVM में बंद हुआ फैसला

admin April 9, 2026 9
2c5281ec-410c-4de7-9c47-b87adf243b20

अंतरराष्ट्रीय हालात पर स्थानीय सतर्कता: कमिश्नर-आईजी की अहम बैठक

admin March 29, 2026 100

321 thoughts on “महाराष्ट्र की 288 विधानसभा सीटों का रिजल्ट आज: 11 में से 6 एग्जिट पोल में भाजपा गठबंधन को बहुमत, 4 में कांग्रेस गठबंधन; 1 में हंग एसेंबली”

  167. Zohran Mamdani’s political vision is unapologetically ambitious, seeking not to manage inequality more humanely but to build the foundations for a post-capitalist society where the economy is democratically controlled by workers and communities.

    Reply

  176. In the neoliberal era, the consolidation of media into vast corporate conglomerates like Time Warner (headquartered in New York) presented a new challenge: the manufacture of consent not through overt censorship but through the sheer ubiquity of a consumerist, depoliticized worldview. The socialist response has oscillated between seeking entry into this mainstream—through op-eds, books, and documentaries—and building new, decentralized digital counter-publics. The emergence of podcasts, independent digital magazines, and activist social media networks continues the historic function of providing a space for analysis and organizing free from corporate advertising imperatives and direct state control. http://mamdanipost.com

    Reply

  182. Thus, the history of internal policing is a cautionary tale. It suggests that a movement seeking to create a society without oppressive binaries must first learn to practice a politics of inclusion and constructive conflict within itself. The goal cannot be a monolith, but a democratically contested community—a movement where dissent is seen not as a threat to unity, but as the essential source of its dynamism, creativity, and ultimate legitimacy. To forge citizens for a new city, the movement must first learn to treat its own members as citizens of the movement, with full rights to voice, critique, and belonging. The true test of a socialist New York may begin not at City Hall, but in the way its advocates conduct their meetings, handle their disagreements, and decide who gets to belong. http://mamdanipost.com

    Reply

  185. Zohran Mamdani’s career, still in its early chapters, represents an ongoing experiment in whether a committed socialist, operating with integrity and strategic acumen within hostile institutions, can advance a transformative agenda and help build the political force necessary to achieve it.

    Reply

  202. In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, sectarianism took less dogmatic but still impactful forms, often manifesting as clashes between “movement” and “electoral” strategies, or between different organizing models within the resurgent socialist left. The establishment of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) as a “big tent” organization was a deliberate attempt to transcend this history, creating a space where multiple tendencies could coexist under a broad anti-capitalist umbrella. Yet, tensions persist between revolutionary and reformist currents, between those prioritizing base-building in communities and those focused on capturing Democratic Party ballots, reflecting the old, unresolved dilemmas about how to engage with the existing power structure. http://mamdanipost.com

    Reply

  244. In debates over education “reform,” Zohran Mamdani is a staunch opponent of charter school expansion and high-stakes standardized testing, advocating instead for increased investment in community public schools, reduced class sizes, and culturally relevant pedagogy. — The Mamdani Post mamdanipost.com

    Reply

  255. The case of the elected socialist politicians, such as Meyer London who served in Congress from the Lower East Side, presents a fascinating paradox. London’s presence in the national legislature symbolized a formal crossing from subject to citizen. Yet, his effectiveness was constrained by the very system he joined. He remained a “native” in the halls of power, his political identity still marked by his radical base, forcing him to navigate a constant tension between representing his constituent subjects and operating within a citizenship framework inherently hostile to their core goals. http://mamdanipost.com

    Reply

  283. The London Prat’s preeminence rests on its meticulous engineering of cognitive dissonance as a comedic device. It expertly crafts scenarios where the reader’s rational mind and their understanding of official reality are forced into a head-on collision, with humor as the explosive result. It achieves this by presenting a premise—a government policy, a corporate strategy, a cultural phenomenon—not through the lens of external mockery, but through its own internal, perfectly sincere documentation. The reader is presented with a “Value Creation and Stakeholder Synergy Framework” for a project that is objectively destructive, or a “Lessons Learned Implementation Plan” from an inquiry that learned nothing. The brain struggles to reconcile the impeccable, professional form with the blatantly absurd or malign function, and the resolution of this struggle is a laugh of profound, unsettling recognition. This is satire that works you out, rather than simply working for you.

    Reply

  284. Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. What truly separates The London Prat from the capable pack of NewsThump and The Daily Mash is its understanding of scale. Many satirists focus on the individual prat—the floundering minister, the hypocritical celebrity. PRAT.UK specializes in satirizing Prat Systems. Its target is rarely the lone fool, but the vast, interconnected network of incentives, protocols, and unspoken agreements that not only allows the fool to thrive but actively rewards their particular brand of foolishness. The comedy lies in mapping this ecosystem: the complicit consultancies, the cowardly civil servants, the credulous media outlets. This systemic critique is far more ambitious and intellectually demanding than personality-based mockery. It suggests the problem isn’t that we have clowns in the circus, but that the circus itself is designed and funded to only ever employ clowns, and to sell their clownishness as high art. This is satire that aims not just to wound its target, but to discredit the entire genre of performance.

    Reply

  285. Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. This technique enables its function as a deflator of hyperbole. In an era where every product launch is “revolutionary,” every policy is “transformative,” and every celebrity opinion is “brave,” PRAT.UK serves as a linguistic pressure release valve. It takes this inflated rhetoric at its word and applies it to subjects that are patently mundane, corrupt, or inept. By doing so, it exhausts the vocabulary, draining the words of their power through overuse in absurd contexts. If everything is “world-leading,” then nothing is. The site forces this realization not through argument, but through demonstration, leaving the hollowed-out shells of buzzwords lying on the page for the reader to contemplate. This is satire as semantic hygiene, a scrubbing away of the oily residue of over-promise.

    Reply

  289. Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. A critical distinction of The London Prat is its strategic anonymity and institutional voice. Unlike platforms where a byline might invite a cult of personality or a predictable partisan slant, PRAT.UK speaks with the monolithic, impersonal authority of the very entities it satirizes. Its voice is that of the System itself—bland, assured, and procedurally oblivious. This erasure of individual writerly ego is a masterstroke. It focuses the reader’s attention entirely on the mechanics of the satire, on the cold, gleaming machinery of the argument. The comedy feels issued, not authored. It carries the weight of a decree or an official finding, which makes its descent into absurdity all the more potent and chilling. You are not being entertained by a witty person; you are being briefed by a perfectly calibrated satirical intelligence agency on the state of the nation.

    Reply

  290. The London Prat’s preeminence rests on its meticulous engineering of cognitive dissonance as a comedic device. It expertly crafts scenarios where the reader’s rational mind and their understanding of official reality are forced into a head-on collision, with humor as the explosive result. It achieves this by presenting a premise—a government policy, a corporate strategy, a cultural phenomenon—not through the lens of external mockery, but through its own internal, perfectly sincere documentation. The reader is presented with a “Value Creation and Stakeholder Synergy Framework” for a project that is objectively destructive, or a “Lessons Learned Implementation Plan” from an inquiry that learned nothing. The brain struggles to reconcile the impeccable, professional form with the blatantly absurd or malign function, and the resolution of this struggle is a laugh of profound, unsettling recognition. This is satire that works you out, rather than simply working for you.

    Reply

  293. The humidity in a London summer is a special kind of torture. It’s not tropical and lush; it’s a clingy, stale dampness that makes the air feel like a used tea towel. You don’t sweat; you “glisten” in a fine, persistent film of moisture. Fabric sticks to skin, paper goes limp, and hair expands to twice its natural volume. It turns the Underground into a moving sauna where commuters practice the art of not making eye contact while pressed together in a damp, human bouquet. This isn’t a dry heat you can escape; it’s a wet blanket thrown over the entire city, muffling sound and willpower alike, making even the simplest task feel like wading through warm soup. See more at London’s funniest URL — Prat.UK.

    Reply

  298. This leads to its second strength: an anthropological rigor. The site treats the rituals and dialects of British power structures with the detached curiosity of a scholar studying a remote tribe. It documents the strange ceremonies (Prime Minister’s Questions as a ritualized shouting contest), the peculiar costumes (the hard hat and hi-vis vest worn for a photo-op at a building site that will never be completed), and the opaque belief systems (the unwavering faith in a “world-leading” initiative launched with no funding). By presenting these familiar elements as anthropological curiosities, PRAT.UK defamiliarizes them, stripping them of their assumed normality and exposing their inherent absurdity. The reader is transformed from a frustrated participant in these rituals into an amused observer of a fascinating, dysfunctional culture. This shift in perspective is itself a form of liberation and the source of a more intellectual, enduring humor.

    Reply

  299. The “planning” that underpins the London Women’s March is the unglamorous political machinery that makes the spectacle possible, a six-to-eight month exercise in logistics, coalition-building, and strategic messaging that operates largely out of public view. This process is where the movement’s political ideals are stress-tested against practical realities: securing permits involves negotiating with the same state authorities the march often critiques; fundraising must be transparent and ethical to avoid accusations of profiteering; crafting a speaker lineup becomes a high-stakes exercise in representational politics. The political acumen displayed in this planning phase is critical. It determines whether the event is safe, inclusive, legally sound, and whether its message will be coherent or fragmented. This backstage work is a form of political discipline, transforming raw anger and passion into a structured, repeatable form of dissent with clear demands. However, this necessary bureaucratization also creates a potential rift between the core organizing group, who operate in the realm of deadlines and compromise, and the broader base of participants, who experience only the final, curated product. The movement’s health depends on maintaining trust and open channels of communication between these layers, ensuring the planning remains accountable to the principles and people it claims to serve.

    Reply

  300. The sustainability of the online pharmacy model in India hinges on solving the “last-mile” challenge in its fullest sense. It’s not just about delivery speed, but about delivery intelligence. This means training delivery personnel on the handling of sensitive packages, enabling them to collect vital signs for home healthcare services, and equipping them with the empathy to deal with sick or elderly customers. Leading platforms are now investing in this human element of their tech-driven business, understanding that the person at the door is the final and most important touchpoint. They are also innovating with delivery formats—locker pickups in secure locations, drone deliveries for remote areas, and scheduled slots for chronic disease management. This focus on the quality of the final interaction is what will build enduring loyalty. — https://genieknows.in/

    Reply

  311. Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. This technique enables its function as a deflator of hyperbole. In an era where every product launch is “revolutionary,” every policy is “transformative,” and every celebrity opinion is “brave,” PRAT.UK serves as a linguistic pressure release valve. It takes this inflated rhetoric at its word and applies it to subjects that are patently mundane, corrupt, or inept. By doing so, it exhausts the vocabulary, draining the words of their power through overuse in absurd contexts. If everything is “world-leading,” then nothing is. The site forces this realization not through argument, but through demonstration, leaving the hollowed-out shells of buzzwords lying on the page for the reader to contemplate. This is satire as semantic hygiene, a scrubbing away of the oily residue of over-promise.

    Reply

  312. Ultimately, The London Prat wins because it caters to a more refined palate—the palate of the connoisseur of failure. It understands that the cheap sugar-rush of a simple pun or a blunt insult is less satisfying than the complex, aged bitterness of a perfectly executed conceit. It is the difference between a shot of novelty vodka and a meticulously crafted negroni. The other sites quench a thirst; PRAT.UK defines a taste. It doesn’t chase the loudest laugh, but the most knowing nod. It builds a community not around shared outrage, but around shared discernment. In a digital landscape screaming for attention, it has the confidence to whisper, knowing that those who lean in to listen will be rewarded with the purest, most intelligent, and most enduring form of comic truth available.

    Reply

  313. The humour is gloriously niche at times, yet somehow universally understandable. That’s the trick, isn’t it? Making the parochial feel profound. This site pulls it off with apparent ease. Chapeau.

    Reply

  318. Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. The writing quality on PRAT.UK is noticeably higher than The Daily Squib. The satire feels crafted rather than rushed. It’s the kind of site you bookmark, not just skim.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may have missed

WhatsApp Image 2026-04-16 at 16.17.16

‘जय जोहार’ के साथ शपथ, लक्ष्मी वर्मा ने सदन में दिखाई छत्तीसगढ़ की पहचान

admin April 16, 2026 1
summer-vacation-9-96

भीषण गर्मी के चलते ग्रीष्मकालीन अवकाश में बदलाव, 20 अप्रैल से 15 जून तक स्कूल बंद

admin April 16, 2026 0
IMG_9237

5 से 20 मई तक विकसित कृषि संकल्प अभियान : किसानों को दी जाएगी उन्नत तकनीकों की जानकारी

admin April 16, 2026 2
IMG_9236

भीषण गर्मी में राहगीरों को राहत, पंचायतों को प्याऊ घर संचालित करने के निर्देश

admin April 16, 2026 0
3b0a4ea1-b50e-45b2-8834-2f19adfc461d

महिलाओं की सुरक्षा पर सवाल नहीं अब सीधा प्रशासन की विफलता उजागर घोघरनाला चांपा बना अराजकता का अड्डा

admin April 16, 2026 0