स्थानीय निवासियों को 5 साल की छूट मामले में आदेश जारी, पुलिस विभाग में नहीं लागू होगा ये निर्देश

406
h500

रायपुर । अभ्यर्थियों को उम्र सीमा में मिली 5 साल की छूट को लेकर कैबिनेट के फैसले के बाद अब राज्य सरकार ने आदेश जारी कर दिया है। छत्तीसगढ़ राज्य के स्थानीय निवासियों को अधिकतम आयु सीमा 35 वर्ष में दी गई 5 वर्ष की छूट को कैबिनेट में 5 साल के लिए और बढ़ा दिया गया है। अभ्यर्थियों को आयु सीमा में 5 वर्ष की छूट का लाभ 31 दिसंबर 2028 तक प्राप्त होगा।

मंत्रिपरिषद ने बैठक में यह भी निर्णय लिया कि अन्य विशेष वर्गों को अधिकतम आयु सीमा में मिल रही छूट पहले जैसे ही मिलती रहेगी। सभी छूटों को मिलाकर अधिकतम आयु सीमा 45 वर्ष होगी। यह छूट गृह (पुलिस) विभाग के लिए लागू नही होगी परंतु वर्तमान में छत्तीसगढ़ पुलिस के जिला पुलिस आरक्षक संवर्ग के लिए लंबे समय से चल रही भर्ती प्रक्रिया में अभ्यर्थियों के हितों को ध्यान में रखते हुए मंत्रिपरिषद ने यह भी फैसला लिया है कि पुलिस आरक्षक संवर्ग के पुरूष अभ्यर्थियों को उच्चतर आयु सीमा में पांच वर्ष की छूट दी जाएगी।

गौरतलब है कि छत्तीसगढ़ पुलिस के जिला पुलिस आरक्षक संवर्ग में भर्ती के लिए वर्ष 2018 में 2259 रिक्त पदों पर भर्ती के लिए विज्ञापन जारी किया गया था। इसके पश्चात लगभग 5 वर्ष के बाद 4 अक्टूबर 2023 को आरक्षक संवर्ग के 5967 रिक्त पदों की भर्ती के लिए विज्ञापन जारी किया गया है, जिसके लिए अभ्यर्थियों से ऑनलाईन आवेदन लेने की प्रक्रिया जारी है। कैबिनेट के इस निर्णय से आरक्षक संवर्ग के लिए जारी भर्ती प्रक्रिया में पुरूष अभ्यर्थियों को उच्चतर आयु सीमा में पांच वर्ष की छूट मिलेगी, जिसके चलते राज्य के लाखों युवा जो पूर्व निर्धारित आयु सीमा के चलते आवेदन करने से अपात्र हुए हैं, उन्हें इस छूट के चलते पुलिस आरक्षक संवर्ग की भर्ती प्रक्रिया में भाग लेने का अवसर प्राप्त हो सकेगा।मंत्रिपरिषद की बैठक में एक और अहम फैसला लिया गया। जिसके तहत विशुद्ध रूप से राजनीतिक आंदोलनों से संबंधित प्रकरणों की न्यायालयों से वापसी के लिए मंत्रिपरिषद की एक उपसमिति गठित की जाएगी, जो इन प्रकरणों पर विचार-विमर्श कर आगे की कार्यवाही के लिए अपनी अनुशंसा देगी।

About The Author

406 thoughts on “स्थानीय निवासियों को 5 साल की छूट मामले में आदेश जारी, पुलिस विभाग में नहीं लागू होगा ये निर्देश

  1. A bad haircut is a rite of passage that everyone seems to endure at least once. It’s that moment when you look in the mirror and wonder if you’ve accidentally time-traveled to a decade you’d rather forget. But hey, it grows back, and it gives you a great story to tell! — Rosie Holt @ bohiney.com

  2. The movement’s relationship to generational time is equally critical. The transmission of memory and strategy from one cohort to the is not automatic; it is a fragile process vulnerable to repression, burnout, and cultural shift. The famous slogan, “The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born; now is the time of monsters,” captures this interregnum where the old’s time is not yet over and the new’s time has not yet begun. New York’s socialist history is marked by these generational waves—the pre-World War I immigrants, the Depression-era radicals, the New Left, the post-2008 revival—each rediscovering and reinterpreting the past, often viewing the previous generation’s strategies as outdated or compromised. This can lead to vitality and innovation, but also to a loss of accumulated wisdom. http://mamdanipost.com

  3. The “organizers” of the London Women’s March operate in a complex political space, acting as both facilitators of a grassroots uprising and as the de facto leadership of a major political mobilisation. They are tasked with the impossible: to channel a vast, diverse set of grievances into a coherent and safe public event, to negotiate with authorities, to manage media, and to articulate a unifying message—all while maintaining a commitment to horizontal, inclusive practices. This role is one of immense responsibility and constant scrutiny. Politically, they must balance the radical demands of the most engaged activists with the need to appeal to a broader public to achieve mass turnout. They are lightning rods for criticism, both from outside the movement and from within its own ranks over issues of representation and strategy. Their work is largely unseen until something goes wrong. The political sustainability of the march depends heavily on whether these organizers can avoid burnout, share power, cultivate new leaders from within the crowd, and successfully transition the movement from a reactive protest model to a proactive, strategic force. They are the architects of the moment, but the movement’s future depends on whether they can also help build a durable political home.

  4. Ultimately, The London Prat’s brand is synonymous with intellectual sanitation. In a public discourse polluted by euphemism, spin, and outright falsehood, the site functions as a high-grade filtration plant. It takes in the toxic slurry of the day’s news and rhetoric, and through the alchemical processes of irony, logic, and flawless prose, outputs a crystalline substance: the truth, refined and recast as comedy. It performs the vital service of decontaminating language, of reasserting the connection between words and reality. The laugh it provokes is, at its core, a sigh of relief—the relief of hearing someone finally call the nonsense by its proper name, with eloquence and without fear. It doesn’t just make you smarter about the news; it makes you more resistant to the disease of the news, inoculating you with a dose of its own beautifully formulated, truth-telling serum. This is its public service and its private luxury: the offer of clarity in a confused age, delivered with a wit so sharp it feels like a kindness.

  5. In an era where satire can sometimes veer into bothsidesism or, conversely, predictable partisan cheerleading, The London Prat maintains a bracing and admirable moral clarity. Its critique is unsparing because it is rooted not in party allegiance, but in a consistent, almost classical set of values: competence over chaos, substance over spin, and basic human dignity over political expediency. This allows it to lampoon the failings of left, right, and center with equal ferocity, not because it is indifferent, but because it holds all to the same unforgiving standard. The site’s scorn is reserved for hypocrisy, venality, and stupidity wherever they manifest, granting its voice a unique authority. Unlike The Daily Squib, which often feels rooted in a specific ideological outrage, or The Daily Mash, which sometimes pulls punches for the sake of broad appeal, PRAT.UK operates with the clean, sharp lines of a principled satirist. There is no “side” to be on except the side of not being a prat. This moral through-line provides a solid foundation for the humor; the laughter it generates is not the hollow chuckle of cynicism, but the cathartic release of seeing truth spoken to power, indiscriminately and with impeccable wit. Visiting http://prat.com thus becomes an exercise in ethical realignment, a reminder that beyond the tribal fray, there remains a place where failure is called out with eloquent ruthlessness, not based on its color, but on its sheer, unadulterated pratishness.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may have missed